Join Wireless London to Research the article “Extended warranties for TVs are almost always a waste of money”
Black Friday and the holiday buying season are here, and once you’re in the store paying for your new hella cheap TV, or maybe something a little nicer, you might be offered an extended warranty.
Extend your TV’s warranty for a small fee, offers the salesman, in case anything goes wrong. At first this seems like a decent idea. After all, TVs are expensive, very high-tech, and pretty complex, right?
Dig a little deeper, however, and you’ll find that extended warranties are almost always a waste of money.
Perception: The factory warranty isn’t great
This is true. Most factory warranties are a year on parts, and three months on labor (or occasionally a full year on labor, too). As you can guess, the labor is the expensive part. However, this isn’t the whole story, as we’ll see in the next part.
Perception: Flat-panel TVs are fragile
This isn’t true, at least not as far as warranties are concerned. Yes, you can easily break a TV by dropping it, kicking it, using it as a sled, etc. But the fact is under normal usage, flat-panel TVs are extremely reliable.
To take one example, Consumer Reports has TV repair information from of its readers. In 2016 it surveyed more than 100,000 owners and found a “breakage rate” on a three-year-old TV between 4 and 7 percent, depending on brand, and they say “differences of fewer than 4 points aren’t meaningful.” I’d argue the repair rate is even lower, as people with a problem are far more likely to complain.
Even beyond flat-panel TVs being very reliable, most of the major problems you might encounter with a TV you’re going to see in the first 30 days, which is well within the return policy of most retailers (though that’s). Of the potential problems that might manifest after the first 30 days, the majority of them will happen within the first year (when you’re covered by the manufacturer).
Sure there are going to be stories like, “Well, I bought a TV and it broke,” but keep in mind these are anecdotal. Just because one TV broke, doesn’t mean all TVs break. Well, OK, all TVs do break, we’re arguing about over what period of time.
Over time, your TV will age. It’s possible the power supply or other major component will fail. This is true of any product. Everyone remembers their long-lived CRT tube-TV, but remember, the TVs we all grew up with had decades of development to get them to that point.
Fix: Statically speaking, your TV isn’t likely to break. Check outfor more info. I don’t recommend, though buying a used plasma.
Perception: Warranties are cheap, so why not?
Well, I can’t argue with you there, at least compared with how expensive they used to be. And “cheap” of course, is relative, as they’re a lot cheaper than replacing the entire TV. But think about why they’re cheaper now than they were. These underwriters aren’t doing you a favor, they price their policies based on what the market determines. If TVs were breaking all over the place, the price would be higher.
I’ll give you another anecdote. When I worked at Circuit City in college, we were required to offer extended warranties at the end of the sale. I don’t remember specific prices, but I do recall a one-year plan on a VCR could cost upwards of 25 percent of the price of the product. A five-year plan on a pair of speakers? Pennies on the dollar. Which do you think is more likely to break?
And another thing, we were often paid more on the extended warranty than we were on the product. What does that say about the profit margin? The same was true, by the way.
It’s also important to check what extended warranties, regardless of price, won’t cover. Most have a dead-pixel threshold. Got one annoying bad pixel? You’re out of luck. Someone “accidentally” wash the screen with Windex and ruin the coating? Almost certainly not covered. Same with power surges.
Fix: With most plans in the 10 percent range of the total price (depending on warranty length), they’re not offensive, per se. But that’s still over $100 on a $1,000 TV, which is not really a small chunk of change. Cheaper than replacement? Sure. But they’re “cheap” because the warranty providers don’t have to replace/fix many TVs. If they did, the plans would be a lot more expensive.
Extended warranties are just insurance for your TV. The provider is betting you won’t have to use the plan, and you’re hoping the same thing. Flat-panel TVs have proven very reliable, so it’s unlikely you’ll need to repair a TV.
But if you’re not comfortable buying something without insurance, don’t let me stop you. Whatever helps you sleep at night. However, if you’re on the fence about extended warranties, just know that you’re probably better off saving the money.
One final point. TV prices drop every year, while size, features, and usually picture quality, all increase. The first plasma TV cost more than $15,000. Now you can get a TV that’s larger, brighter, has better color, and has 21 times the resolution, for under $1000. Let’s say your TV does break in five years. You’ll be able to replace it for far less money than you originally bought it for, or you can get something new that’s even better. QLED perhaps.
If you’re not the type of person who likes the idea of replacing TVs often, and you’re worried about reliability even though the numbers show otherwise, then by all means get a warranty. For everyone else, skip ’em and spend that money on something like a, which will make your TV look better.
Got a question for Geoff? First, check out all the other articles he’s written on topics such as why all HDMI cables are the same, LED LCD vs. OLED, why 4K TVs aren’t worth it and more. Still have a question? Tweet at him @TechWriterGeoff then check out his travel photography on Instagram. He also thinks you should check out his sci-fi novel and its sequel.
Source: Cnet News
Keyword: Extended warranties for TVs are almost always a waste of money